Friday, December 29, 2017

Dave Reviews: Boxed Racism


Let's just talk about the game itself first.

Ancestree is a clever little game of neighbor-bashing, where your goal is to build a more impressive family tree than the people next to you. There are five different dynasties that can run through the generations of your family, some of whom add wealth, others of whom add marriages--surprisingly few, given the number of parent-child relationships running through the game. But, hey, it's open-minded. Gender doesn't matter in the marriages, and if you find a character with a half-heart on each side of their tile, that character can have two legal marriages!

No word on whether those marriages are simultaneous.

Tiles connect either through matching half-hearts on tiles side by side (marriages) or touching the top half of a leaf to a bottom half of the same color leaf (parent-child). You do not need every possible connection to line up; there only has to be one legal connection to make someone part of the family. Stepparents, in-laws, cousins, and all sorts of rational combinations of family can be made part of the tree, which is considerably more interesting than the strict parent-grandparent-great grandparent trees we might be used to seeing.

The game plays out over three rounds. In each round, you add five more people to your family tree. Your goal in building your tree is to have longer runs in each of the five dynasties than your neighbors (which means a dynasty that runs from person to person through the generations; disconnected members of the same dynasty, or members of a dynasty in the same generation, don't count). Your bonuses increase the later in the game you get, so dynasty bonuses in round three are worth more than in round one. You also get bonus points after each round for the coins on the members of your family; these all count every round, so coins played early are worth more than coins played late. At the end of the game, you get bonus points for the number of marriages in the tree (the first few aren't worth much, but they become valuable once you hit four and up). High score wins.

Ancestree is a game that's fun with two people and fun with six. It's easy to understand, quick to play, and requires just enough thinking to make a player feel like she needs to put real effort into winning the game. It might not hold people's attention through twenty playthroughs, but it's reasonably well-crafted and could, at the very least, be a hell of a lot worse.

Then there are the tiles.

I don't want to excessively hammer the designers for this. Even though it also serves to make the game better, it shouldn't be ignored that their rules are very open in regards to how people connect into a family, and that every type of marriage (including multiple) is viable. I also think, or at least I want to think, that their intent in designing the dynasties that went into the game was to include as many cultures as possible rather than having a bunch of white folk in the game. And to some extent it works; you wind up with these bonkers combinations of people that can't possibly make the children your family tree says they made, but it's entertaining as opposed to weird or, really, in any way negative.

But holy shit, the depictions themselves are bad. Like, really bad. The dragon dynasty is Asian, the camel dynasty is Arabic, and so forth, and that's fine, but the characters are dressed in just about the most stereotypical shit possible. It's pretty bad when you open the game in front of a half-dozen different people and all of them say, "Holy shit, these are racist as hell."

The art doesn't affect the gameplay, and the art isn't so bad that it makes the game painful to play because you're looking at these pictures the whole time. A lot of people won't give a shit, and a lot of people will say this complaint is some social justice bullshit. If you're in the former group, that's cool; if you're in the latter, fuck off. Either way, know ahead of time that if you look at the pictures on the box and think, wow, those look pretty racist, it doesn't get any better once you have the package open. (In fairness again, they do put the pictures on the box, and it may have been a much wiser idea not to do that.)

The game's fine. If you want a large game where you're only worried about your neighbors, Seven Wonders is still the standard, and Between Two Cities is simply better than this, but if you have those, this isn't a bad addition. Just figure out what you think of the art before you lay down your money.

Score: Eight looping gifs of Richard Spencer getting punched in the head out of eleven.

Dave Reviews: Fantasy Gin Rummy



Let's get this out of the way now: Ethnos has no business being as good as it is.

More timely reviews suggested that Ethnos' aesthetic doesn't match the gameplay, and I'd agree with that. It has a pretty gloomy look for something that's basically Dragonlance Rummy. The dark air gives the game a sense that you're doing deadly battle over the territory on the board, but that's not really a feel to which the mechanics lend themselves. It's a territory control game, but you're only fighting with numbers, not the people or creatures that form your armies.

Each turn you can draw a card from those face up on the table, draw one blind from the deck, or play a set and hopefully add to your hold on a territory. Every card has a fantasy race, and a color associated with one of the territories on the board. By playing a set of cards that match in either color or race, you can add a token to the territory of that set's leader, the card you play on top. In addition, each race has a special ability, and you can use that ability if the leader of a set is a member of that race.

There are some catches, though, that turn this from "WTF is this" to "Wow, this is pretty good". First, a set can be as small as one card, but in order to add a token to the appropriate territory, the set has to be bigger than the number of tokens you already have there (ie. only a set of three or more can add a token where you already have two). Second, larger sets are worth more bonus points, so as the game continues you're doubly encouraged to build big sets so you gain more control over a territory and get bigger bonuses.

Working at cross-purposes with this, however, is that when you play a set, you have to discard your hand into the face up tableau. You can try and save up for a bigger set, but if you keep getting mismatched cards, you can't just hang on to them for a future turn--you have to discard them for your opponents to take. Even if you were able to get most of them back, you're taking extra turns picking them up a second time, and there's a good chance you can't afford to use too much time doing that.

The game goes through three ages, with increasing (but randomized) numbers of points available for holding each territory at the end of each age. The points for early ages aren't merely gone after they're scored, either; the score for holding a territory at the end of the first age also acts as the second-place reward for that territory in the second age and the third-place reward in the third. Therefore, you don't just consider how hard to go after a territory; when you do it matters as well.

There are twelve fantasy races; six are used in a normal game, five in a three-player game. Each of the races has a special ability that makes sense in the confines of the game (e.g. one race lets you put a token in any territory, one lets you keep a certain number of cards in your hand, and so on), but a couple also add mechanics that add entirely separate pieces. The giants, for example, give a bonus to the first person to have a giant leader in a set, then that bonus again to whoever plays a larger set with a giant leader, and so on. At the end of a round, if someone is holding the giant... piece, they get an extra bonus. Orcs let you create an entirely different type of set over multiple rounds for extra bonus points. It's the kind of thing that would get hammered if they did it poorly, but they didn't, and these ideas work out well.

There are people working on reskins of the game, and those might be more fun to look at, but you don't need them to make this worth playing. Play with four or more if you can for the full experience; three people only play through two ages, and it leaves the game feeling like it's not quite done.

Score: Twenty horny halflings out of twenty-four.

Dave Reviews: Tiny Samurai Tokenfest

Battle for Rokugan

If you plan to put this on the pile of board games set in Japan, remember: It's not set in Japan. This is the Emerald Empire. Totally, 100% different. You don't need to be near water to use boats.

We'll get to that.

Battle for Rokugan is a territory control game. Coming on the heels of Legend of the Five Rings, it lets players take up the mantle of one of seven animal-based clans, each with its own three-province territory carved out on the map. The map is very compact given the number of sides; outside of the territories from each clan, there are two other unaffiliated territories and the Shadowlands, two provinces that don't have the end-game scoring benefit of other provinces but let those in control wield useful powers. Fortunately, the number of players is capped at five, which keeps the board relatively open at any player count.

The way it's open, though, is up to the players from the start. Each clan controls its own capital, but after that players choose provinces to control, one by one. It's often desirable to hold your own provinces, since you get a special ability for each territory you control in full at the end of a round, but it's not required. You can immediately take one of the Shadowland provinces and hold it (or effectively dare your opponents to take it from you), focus your control on the land around you to minimize the ability of anyone else to invade your turf, or start taking pieces out of other people's territory to make them fight for their clan's special ability even if it means you have to fight for your own.

The special abilities are pretty strong—certainly worth having as compared to not, though you do need to decide how much effort you want to put into taking one—but what's intriguing about how they're handled is this: you only have one available to you if you control all the provinces in the related territory at the end of a round, but if you use it, it's removed from the game. More over, these are only used at the start of a round, before any fighting occurs. This creates a sort of timer on the ability cards. Once one is used, the territory it came from becomes less valuable, so if you sit on one waiting for the right opportunity, your opponents may sweep in to make sure you lose it even if they don't have a reasonable chance of taking it for themselves.

Combat works like this: everyone has a pool of tokens to draw from, and each clan has a unique special token somewhere in the mix. You draw five tokens, and play five on the board in turn order. If you play one directly on a territory, that token is being used in defense; if it crosses a border, it's attacking in the direction of its arrow. Most of them are army tokens of varying strength, one through five, which are used in attack or defense. Navies can attack or defend provinces on the water, and you don't need to have a province of your own on the water to attack with a navy. Raid tokens burn a province to the ground, rendering it worthless for the rest of the game. (Important note: this does not mean the territory that province is in can't be held in its entirety. The raided province simply doesn't count, and thus a person can hold the territory by just maintaining control of the other provinces.) Diplomacy teapot tokens invoke peace in the province for the rest of the game, which guarantees control for whoever plays it, but they can no longer attack from that province either. Shinobi attack like armies, except they have a maximum of two power and can go anywhere on the map rather than just from a controlled territory to an adjacent one, because that's what motherfucking ninja do.

You have twenty-five tokens, exactly enough for the five rounds of the game. However, each player also has a blank bluff token that's available every turn. The bluff token has no effect, but it allows you to hold one of the real tokens back for use on a following round. This is handy if you draw something rare and situationally powerful like a shinobi token, but it also means you draw one fewer token on the next round. The more you use your bluff, the more real tokens you wind up not seeing by the end of the game. This means that, mathematically speaking, it's more useful to bluff if you've seen a lot of strong tokens, because there are fewer useful ones that you might miss out on at the end. However, any use of a bluff entails some sort of cost, because the bluff does nothing and even a 1-power army can be valuable.

In many games with a type of hidden strength mechanic, low-power stuff is often, effectively, no more than a bluff. In Battle, 1-power armies can serve another purpose if you don't think you need them to put you over the top in a fight—they can defend a territory that's not under attack. This matters because any territory that's successfully defended gains a token at the end of the round worth +1 defense and one extra victory point at the end of the game. You must put a token in a territory to gain this bonus, but it doesn't have to be attacked to be considered successfully defended. This winds up being a way around the common problem in war games of what to do when you're stuck without a good way to gain more territory—just make your territory more valuable.

Of course, making it more valuable means your enemies want to take it... but if they do, all those tokens are wiped out, so it's only worth it if they need to take your points away more than they need points themselves... but that only becomes apparent by the end of the game... but that leads to the most important fights coming in the last round... and you start to see all the scales being balanced to make the decisions in this game require more than A vs. B thinking.

There's quite a bit to like here. Every decision spans out into multiple consequences. Tracking what your opponents have used becomes more difficult as you add players, but that's a genuine skill and will benefit you if you're good at it. Likewise, each use of the bluff might cost you a real token by the end of the game, but it also throws other people's tracking of your information off a little bit, which can be more or less useful depending on your opponents. Gaining and deciding when to use ability cards is extremely important; on top of that, it's quite possible to gain certain abilities and not be able to use them right away, which means you may need to quickly set up a situation where you can use them if they come from vulnerable territories.

Certain aspects of the rules are unclear at first (the ability to use a navy when you're not on the water needs to be much more explicitly stated), and although I haven't tried it with two players, it's hard to see that being nearly as good as a more full game. It could be right for certain people who like maps large enough for them to substantially expand without coming into conflict--or who like to start conflict by surprise precisely because it's not necessary--but the complications of this game shine through much more brightly with four or five people around the table. It's approachable enough that plenty of gamers, from just above casual to pretty hardcore, will find something to enjoy. If you can get a full game of them together, this is worth your time.

Score: Eight ninja sneaking under the castle out of the nine that started the mission

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Dave Reviews: Queens > Kings


The sequel to Kingdomino. Takes the basic game and adds mechanics to complicate it. BECAUSE WOMEN EMIRITE LOLOLOLOL

This is about as sequel as a sequel gets. Nothing about the mechanics of Kingdomino has changed. Tiles are set out in numerical order, higher numbers being generally more valuable, everybody picks one, and the selection order for the next round is determined by who takes what—lower numbers get earlier picks next time. Putting together tiles of the same type, with as many crowns as possible on those tiles, is the main method for scoring points.

Queendomino adds a new tile type: red construction tiles. A series of buildings are available for purchase (oh yeah, there's money now), which can be placed on any open construction slot. Buildings do not have to be purchased for a slot right away. Purchases happen after a player selects a tile, however, so you have take your spot in the turn order into consideration when deciding how likely it is you'll get a building you want. These buildings can give you knights and towers, as well as bonus points at the end of the game. There's even a dragon that you can use to torch the available building of your choice if no one else has used it that round (purchased buildings can't get burned off someone's board).

Knights collect money. You can use them once, on the tile you played that turn, and they collect money equal to the size of the linked terrain you placed the knight on. Balancing the knights, and money, you have against the buildings you need is important, because money is only worth a small number of points at the end of the game. Towers determine who the Queen works with; having the Queen on your side makes construction cheaper, and she acts as an extra crown in the territory of your choice if she's with you at the end of the game.

If you've played Kingdomino, you're already about eighty percent sure of how you'll feel about Queendomino. The additions don't change the core of the game, they simply offer more to think about. Given how simple Kingdomino is, that will likely be a positive to many fans. If you haven't played Kingdomino, the only reason to start there is if you need the simplest possible game. Queendomino is still easy to learn.

The thing about Queendomino is that it doesn't really fit a niche. Kingdomino is a beginner-level game, the kind of thing you show to people who are not gamers in an effort to bring them into the hobby with something that's guaranteed not to confuse them. Queendomino is basically what you show those people next, an exercise in how a game can have complexity added to it. It's hard to say who this game targets as an audience. It's good but not amazing, simple but not especially simple, contains some complexity but not that much. It's a good game. It's just hard to say, for anyone who hasn't played Kingdomino, how much they're liable to like it.

Score: Four crowns in fields out of the five that would have won me the game, damnit.

Monday, December 18, 2017

Kobolds and Catacombs Dungeon Run: It's Not Broken And Blizzard Doesn't Hate You (A Guide)

If you research what makes up the greatest proportion of traffic on the Internet, the list goes like this:

1. Spam (70%)
2. Porn (13.5%)
3. Complaining (9.83%)

Thus it wasn't much of a shock to go to the Hearthstone forums and find people griping about the new Dungeon Run being unbalanced, broken, etc., and that certain classes are terrible. That being said, it was still a small surprise to see so many different complaints in such a small space, most of which were then followed by replies that said nothing was broken and all these other people had managed beating Boss X or clearing the dungeon with Class Y with no problem. I stayed on the edge of the whimpering black hole, careful not to get sucked into the vortex, and then went to Google to see if anyone had written a guide.

Much to my actual surprise, there isn't much. Metabomb has a guide that was written early and hasn't been fully completed yet, and Icy Veins has a rundown of how the mode plays with a much more helpful list of bosses (in the order of potential appearance rather than alphabetical). So, here in my infinitesimally small corner of the web, I'll use what they've written and fill in some gaps. I'm also keeping it all on one page rather than the way Icy Veins makes you click a link for every separate thing. Each boss link leads to its Gamepedia deck list, if you want to see exactly what you're up against.

If you see any issues, leave a comment.

Note: The farther you get into the run, the more variable the right strategy becomes. This is just designed to be a quick overview of each boss with some broadly applicable approaches. However, apart from the final bosses, every boss should be beatable by every class with most types of decks unless you get particularly unlucky in some fashion. If you keep getting unlucky, consider the possibility it's not all luck.

Building Your Deck

Because I have other things to do, I'm not going to break down every class, much less every bucket. The randomness of the offered cards makes ultra-specific guidance difficult or impossible, and once you're comfortable with the mode you won't need it anyway. Rather, here are some basic tips:
  • Synergy > individually powerful cards. This means both synergy within the deck and the deck's synergy with your treasures. If you get a good bucket right off the bat, look to take the same bucket type when it shows up again. Don't do it mindlessly, though; you still need your deck to have overall strength, ie. a good curve and not an excessive number of spells with minimal board presence. And some buckets that technically aren't part of the same group will still offer cards that synergize well with what you have.
  • Play around your early treasures if possible. Very few treasures (see below) are good with any deck, and even those can have their value maximized if you build your deck to exploit them. The Captured Flag, for example, gains massive benefits from a zoo-type deck, especially minions that produce other minions (e.g. Fire Fly), or just being in a shaman or paladin decks. Be forewarned that if you take more situational treasures early, like Totem of the Dead or Battle Totem, you may not be offered the cards to take advantage of them.
  • You're going to need some big minions. Too many things in the dungeon can wipe a small board. If you get the Captured Flag, your flexibility in this respect increases dramatically.
  • Most deck archetypes can succeed, and they can all fail. Here are a few that can do especially well:
    • Jade Druid
    • Deathrattle Hunter
    • Unique Priest (don't get a double of anything!)
    • Jade Rogue
    • Anything that can maintain board presence regardless of what the enemy does

The Dungeon

Level One:
  • Bink the Burglar, Giant Rat, Wee Whelp. Just rush them down. There's no real way for them to win if you're trying. The rat is the only one that can surprise you, if it gets out a handful of rats and then throws down a Timber Wolf, but in basically all cases you can throw everything at the face with only the most obvious trades and not be in danger.

Level Two and Three (except for Candlebeard, all the level two bosses also appear on level three with the same hero powers and presumably the same decks):
  • Candlebeard. His charge effect isn't limited like in the regular game; minions can go face right away. He also has Pit Vipers and Stoneskin Basilisks that can take something out immediately. However, it costs a mana for him to give minions charge, so you won't be suffering massive face damage right from the start. If you take a high-mana bucket first and get a bad draw, just do whatever you can to survive until you stabilize. Any decent draw should be an easy win.
  • Elder Brandlemar. There are three basic approaches—don't cast a spell after turn two, only cast a spell to trigger his counterspell so you can cast another on the same turn, or cast something to trigger his counterspell so he spends two mana on another one the next turn rather than playing something to the board. Base your approach on what you draw.
  • Frostfur. He freezes a minion for two mana, so go wide (more minions) rather than have one big thing on the board. Taunts are fantastic. Trading is more important here; he doesn't have board wipes, so go ahead and leave yourself with some 1 hp minions if it means he has more targets to deal with.
  • Graves the Cleric. His hero power is useless early; healing all minions for two doesn't do much with what he plays the first couple of turns apart from Northshire Cleric. On turn three he can drop an Injured Blademaster and heal it so you're staring at a 4/5. His health is low enough that if you have minions out but no efficient way to remove the Blademaster, you can generally keep playing stuff and go face to beat him before he out-values you. Almost every deck should have enough go-face capacity to aggro out a win.
  • Overseer Mogark. Plays a lot of eggs in order to use his Inner Rage hero power on them so they kill something and pop out something else nasty, and sometimes Rampage on top of that. If you've come across any silences, just one on a Nerubian Egg can break his whole plan for long enough that you smash him. Unless you have a way to deal with the deathrattle effects, rush him down.
  • Pathmaker Hamm. So many bombs. He only hits any given target once, so there's no need to play out a 1/1 on the first turn (e.g. Jade Idol) that will get killed for no reason. With the Mad Bombers, though, you need to throw down as many minions as you can so that your board only gets damaged rather than completely wiped. Certain passives make this much easier, namely the +1/+1 to all minions, or the Justicar's Ring on shaman or paladin. Know when to trade a damaged minion into one of his and you can otherwise brute force this down.
  • Seriona. The most dangerous level two boss. Her hero power is the weakest, but she has a dragon deck with the new 4-cost dragon that Hellfires your board. If the game goes late enough, she also has the new 4/12 taunt dragon, which many decks are not going to be equipped to deal with. If you have enough minions with 4+ health, you shouldn't have much to worry about, but certain decks will be vulnerable to her cards.

Level Four Only:
  • A.F. Kay: Does nothing until turn 6. On turn 6, she plays Boots of Haste and fills the board with 8/8s. She has no taunts or charge minions, so you'll have your turn 7 to finish her off before she gets to attack, but she can play Ragnaros the Lightlord for some healing. After that, most decks without sufficient taunts or removal will just die, but most decks are capable of winning by that point.
  • Brimstone Warden: The obvious thing here is to not let him get five mana crystals. However, the sooner you can kill his statues the better, since that will limit what else he can play against you. Hard removal is amazing here, although Mulch is playing with fire a little bit. Several minions work better than fewer, larger ones due to his poison creatures and traps. He'll also play more statues if you clear most of the ones that start on the board, but in general the game should end before you see more than one or two extras.
  • Fungalmancer Flurgl: Clear everything early, go face if you get so far ahead that he can't stop you. If he takes over the board, the hero power will destroy you without an AOE clear. Even if, for example, you battle to turn eight and then Twisting Nether, he can follow that with six mana of minions and a hero power. Not hard unless you draw super heavy, but this is one of those bosses that gives you a reason to make sure your deck curves well.
  • Kraxx: Set up your board with the awareness everything will take one damage at the start of his turn and it's otherwise a fairly straightforward game. He builds a lot of armor, has cards that make use of lots of armor, and holds a couple of 5/9 taunts, but as long as you don't play into his hero power or his Executes you shouldn't have too much trouble.

Level Four and Five:
  • Battlecrier Jin'zo: Abuse his double battlecry effect if you have the cards to do it. Beware the effect if you have negative battlecries (e.g. Doomguard). Low health minions are particularly vulnerable to effects like double Ravaging Ghoul. He also has cards like Bomb Lobber and Bomb Squad, so balancing the number of minions you have with the health of those minions is wise. Be aware he has Blubber Barons which can come out massive if he's held them from the beginning of the game.
  • Blackseed: Get minions out and do everything you can to control the board. If he plays something like Dopplegangster, it's doubly important you wipe it the next turn—bad enough for him to upgrade one of those 5-costs, you don't need him doing it again. If you can't kill everything he has, your next priority is to remove anything that could kill something of yours and then be evolved, which effectively heals it. If he's allowed to trade and evolve the same creature over and over, you're in trouble.

    When he plays Living Mana, leave the crystals up if you can; he doesn't evolve them and it leaves him with no mana for the next turn while he trades the crystals into your minions. If you have stealthed minions and can survive the Living Mana crystals attacking your face, the fight is easy.
  • Elder Jari: Praise RNGesus if you get him. Treat it like a normal game; his deck and hero power are built around his survival, so make the best trades you can to stay on top of the board. He can at least theoretically ramp into Ysera, Kun, and Ultimate Infestation, so if the game goes late have something ready to deal with those eventualities.
  • Gutmook: Plays a lot of troggs, so you'll often have more reasons not to cast a spell than the fear of spawning a Tunnel Trogg, and he plays things like King Mukla that give you cheap spells which will help him far more than you. If you can control all the ways in which he would benefit from your spells, though, the fight's pretty easy. If you can't, and you're running a spell-heavy deck, this one might hurt. Having the +3 spell damage passive can actually help a reasonable amount if you have enough spells that benefit from it, but in general this one comes down to the quality of the minions you draw. 
  • Lyris the Wild Mage: She's slightly annoying until the Flamewakers come out, at which point she can become monstrous. Everything in this match needs to be focused on removing Flamewakers. Fortunately, she may be the most predictable boss in the game. If she has three mana, she'll play a Flamewaker; if she has less than three but more than zero, she'll play Arcane Missiles if she has one in her hand, and her hero power if she doesn't.

    This means that if it's turn six, she'll play two Flamewakers and no spells, regardless of circumstances. Thus it's sometimes correct to wait on playing minions that could die to Arcane Missiles, especially high attack/low health minions, so that they're in position to take out Flamewakers instead. If all she has to work with is Arcane Missiles and the Flamewakers she played to the board that turn, you should beat her well before she becomes a problem.
  • Mushhuckster Max: His hero power is Kazakus potions. Try to play your deck to the best of its potential, because you don't know what he's going to throw at you. If you're lucky, his potions won't do much and he'll let his hand fill so that his potion autocast doesn't actually make anything. Usually beatable without doing anything special, but if you go all-in and leave yourself vulnerable to a Kazakus potion (ie. a large board of low health minions) you might get punished.
  • Russell the Bard: If you don't play anything with two or less attack, his hero power is worthless. Either leave them in your hand or wait until you can play several at once so you still have most of them once he steals one. Unless your entire deck is based on these types of minions, this is generally enough to win.
  • Spiritspeaker Azun: Jin'zo's opposite. If you have the stealthed minions passive, this fight is trivial, as Azun can't trigger his deathrattles without running his minions into yours. If you don't have stealthed minions, do your best to avoid letting him have good trades—you don't need him getting the better of a trade and then a good double deathrattle on top of it. 
  • Thaddock the Thief: Quest rogue. If she played intelligently, she might be end boss-level difficult. Because of that, if she gets the perfect draw, it's not impossible for this to be an extremely difficult fight. But she doesn't play intelligently. She spends all her mana every turn, even if that means playing the minion she's using for the quest with no mana left to bring it back into her hand with her hero power. Pay attention to what she's returning and re-playing and kill it if she lets it stick to the board. This can be annoying if it's Glacial Shard, but even in that case you should get your chance.  If she doesn't finish the quest, you win.

    If she does complete the quest, your fate largely depends on how close you are to winning at that time (barring something like the Scepter of Summoning that may let you fight back against the 5/5 horde). Should you get unlucky and she pops the quest within a couple of turns, try to burn her down before she has the mana to cast the quest reward, and keep her board clear going into her turn five so nothing automatically becomes a 5/5. After that, just try to keep threatening minions out; she plays very inefficiently, removing minions when going pure aggro would kill you within a couple of turns, and even returning her minions to her hand before attacking with them.
  • Waxmancer Sturmi: He has mostly deathrattle minions, so the 1/1 copies he makes of his own stuff can be annoying. Try to beat him before those deathrattles become too much of a hassle. Avoid playing anything he can abuse unless it would still be to your advantage overall.
  • Whompwhisker: Not everything in his deck is massive, although some games it seems that way. The biggest headache is if he recruits the 4/12 taunt dragon early. If you have a hard removal card, save it for as long as you can unless you have others to rely on. In general this is a burn fight; if he recruits smaller stuff, you need to win before the really dangerous minions come out, and if he recruits the big things immediately, you often won't have a good way to deal with them. On top of that, if you manage a massive board advantage, he can cast Brawl. Don't overload on big minions in fear of seeing this guy, but if you do happen to face him, it's good to have a few.

Level Six Only:
  • George and Karl: At first, your goal is to keep Divine Shield off of the minions, as George will play a monster Blood Knight given the opportunity. A common opening is Lost In The Jungle (two 1/1s), hero power (divine shields on both), then a 9/9 blood Knight. Cards that buff Silver Hand Recruits are also in their deck, so ignoring an army of 1/1s is not advised. If you kill George, Karl jumps in with a fresh 30 HP and a new hero power (two 1/1 recruits, same as the upgraded paladin power), so don't finish off George until you're ready for Karl. Just hold down the board and you should be fine.
  • Gnosh the Greatworm: His hero power is scary until you realize he'll eat his own minions. At some point you may be able to get enough minions on the board so that it doesn't matter if he eats one of yours, but in general you want to abuse his use of berserkers so that he clears his own board and you have free reign to beat his ass.
  • Ixlid: The cry of a thousand bitter gamers rises up from this one. If a reason exists to have smaller minions in your deck, it's the mere possibility of facing Ixlid. The spores from his hero power need to be removed; early on it's probably enough to make sure you have a taunt up, since the hero power is automatic, but it's much better not to take the risk of something removing your taunt and letting the spore insta-kill you.

    A deck that curves well and mulligans hard for early game cards will usually be fine, but it's possible to just get screwed no matter what you do. If it happens every time you face him, though, you might want to look more carefully at how you build your decks or choose your passives/treasures.
  • Tad: Every turn, Tad pulls a random minion from his deck. That's all he does. He has no hand of cards and doesn't draw any. It's a walkover fight if you just try to beat him, but if you don't touch him and let him live until he's summoned his whole deck, he summons a Sunken Chest that puts Tad's Pole in your dungeon deck. He summons the deck in mana cost order; kill the Starving Crab when it shows up so it doesn't damage Tad if you want the prize.
  • Treasure Vault (no deck): This is the one boss I haven't seen, but apparently it's just a room of treasure chests that you have five turns to kill for loot to help the last two fights of your run.

Level Seven Only:
  • Chronomancer Inara: Her hero power looks insane at a glance, but keep in mind it takes ten mana to use. She can't play anything else on the turn, so she's destroying three mana crystals in order to get an extra attack with whatever she has on the board. If you clear her board before any turn where she'll have ten mana, the hero power is effectively wasted.

    Much more dangerous is the Astral Portal that brings out a random legendary for one mana; lots of legendary minions are crap, but if she has that card early and gets one that isn't crap, it's difficult or impossible to deal with. All you can do is make sure any minions like the Archmage's Apprentice that amplify the potential of her portals are cleared immediately.
  • Jeeru: Jeeru takes advantage of the fact that so many other bosses are troublesome for zoo-type decks with lots of cheap cards. Since most decks are going to have plenty of more costly cards, it's extremely difficult to make use of the card draw she's giving you without burning some. Given her hero power, you'd expect that she has a ton of cheap stuff, but she winds up burning a ton of cards herself and goes to fatigue as quickly as you do. The Arcane Golems and Dirty Rats in her deck also help you quite a bit. She punishes super-heavy decks and terrible draws, but just play as many cards as you can each turn and it should be enough.
  • The Mothergloop: Take advantage of the fact her hand buff hero power is on autocast and limits how much mana she can spend on minions each turn and bash her face as often as possible, because you will not be able to clear her minions without hard removal or hyper-buffed minions. Try to save that type of removal for taunts boosted taunts (just Saronite Chain Gang, thankfully) or when she'll have lethal without a clear. Some decks will manage, some won't. Very few will have an easy time.
  • Trapped Room: Probably the most frustrating room you can come across, and definitely the one with the least apparent correct approach. If you have a way to routinely remove 3/3 sawblades, you might not have much of a problem. However, because the traps are random, and the real danger is usually the sawblade that spawns as opposed to the secret itself, it's difficult to do anything without putting yourself in massive danger.

    The only relatively safe approach is for a hunter to use their hero power every turn; unless one of the secrets is Dart Trap, the hunter can kill the room before the Secretkeepers the room has in its deck can kill the hunter (since they never get buffed). However, if the room plays an Ethereal Arcanist, the Arcanist has to die, and playing something that can kill it can set off traps which drag you into the mire.

    More broadly, try not to set off more than one or two traps on a turn unless you can clear them, or spam everything if the room has a full board that prevents the sawblades from spawning. And if you manage to find something that doesn't set off a trap (e.g. playing a minion), do that as much as you can before doing something else that can set off a trap that will then be replaced with who knows what. Stay on your feet until the room plays the 4 mana 7/7 that clears the board when it survives damage; in many cases that will be the only thing that can save you.

    Side note: I believe that no trap gets played more than once. That doesn't make it much easier to track, but it's a little something to go on.

Level Six and Seven:
  • Blackseed: Instead of evolving minions to something that costs 1 more, now he evolves them into something that costs 3 more. The small advantage you have is that now it costs him a mana to do that, so if he spends all his mana playing minions, you can clear them without him getting to evolve any. If you can get a big enough board lead, his evolves won't matter anymore, but getting to that point is the trick.
  • Bristlesnarl: Give this little bastard too long and you'll end up staring down a zoo of giant creatures. Even a board wipe doesn't always help, since it includes stuff like Savannah Highmanes. He carries Deadly Shot and Kill Command, so try to avoid leaving a single big creature out to get merked by that, but otherwise most decks will need to rush him down before his card discounts overwhelm you.
  • Candlebeard: Effectively the same as earlier but with more health and the ability to give minions charge for free, which can be an enormous problem for some decks and a trivial one for others (ones with taunts, or secrets that can counter attacks). This is the one battle where having the Cloak of Invisibility can be a major problem for you, as it gives Candlebeard no reason to do anything but smash your face.

    Your higher health should counter his ability to apply charge to everything immediately for a while, hopefully long enough to get minions out that he attacks instead of you. Be aware the longer game means it's easier for the board to build to a point where he can play a Sea Giant cheaply, the poison minions will have better targets, and the potential exists for him to dump several cheap cards in one turn and have them all charge. If you have a deck focused around removing threats, as powerful as it is almost everywhere else, there's a good chance you're not going to win this fight.
  • Gutmook: This version of Gutmook is far worse than the first. Getting your hand loaded with coins and bananas that will give him a free card every time you use one is bad, and knowing that card, whatever it is, will only cost one, is shit. You really need to rely hard on minion strength and be very judicious in your use of spells, even if your deck is focused around spells. A good deck should have enough minions to handle this fight, but you won't have a lot of room in your hand outside of the junk he piles into it, so a reasonable draw is still needed.
  • Lava-Filled Chamber: Don't play anything with two or less health unless you have a specific reason (battlecry/deathrattle effect, to set up a rogue combo, etc). The room's hero power damage only applies to played minions, not summoned ones, so totems and paladin recruits are especially useful here. The room's deck is mostly removal, so it can be useful to play weaker cards to bait out some of the removal before laying out the stuff you want to have survive. Thankfully, the most damage you'll have to do to any single enemy minion to remove it is six (Ragnaros after taking the room damage), so controlling the board isn't too hard for most decks, and if you have that you win—the room will save its damage spells for your minions unless it can finish you off.
  • Overseer Mogark: Now that his hero power gives minions five attack instead of two, sometimes it will be correct to clear his deathrattle eggs if you can also deal with the monster that comes out. Always clear any other minion you see. The eggs become doubly problematic with the higher health totals, as he has Brawl in his deck; if you see him early in the run, the game generally ends before Brawl can become a problem, but on level six or seven he can Brawl before you have him near death. If you can efficiently remove whatever minions he puts out, you'll be fine; if not, cross your fingers.
  • Pathmaker Hamm: He throws three bombs instead of two at this later level, but apart from the first few turns it's not all that troublesome—you'll often have improved your deck beyond what the extra damage can do to you. The longer games mean more Madder Bombers, though, and if you can't gain a foothold they can combine with Rotface to make your life hell in a hurry. If you keep the board clear, you should naturally win before any of that becomes a problem.
  • Voodoomaster Vex: This is a hard fight to give advice on because the way what he plays can affect your deck varies so much. The more helpful battlecries and deathrattles you have in your deck, the more you can take advantage of the double-ups, but that's obvious. He has some questionably chosen cards in his deck, like Bomb Squad, so abuse him if you see them. Otherwise just do your best, and if the fight gives you trouble, try to remember what he does and use that information if you see him again.
  • Waxmancer Sturmi: This fight seems much worse than the early version, given that he can copy out full-sized minions for three mana, but his deck doesn't help him much in that respect since only Princess Huhuran, Sylvanas, and Savannah Highmane are going to be huge problems if he drops three-mana versions of them on the board, and he needs eight or nine mana to copy them the same turn he plays them. In this version more than the first, avoid playing anything that will be of greater advantage to him if he copies it than you. He has no AOE except Explosive Trap, so flood the board if you can with 3+ health minions.

Level Eight:

This part of the dungeon has been focused on more in other places, like the Metabomb link above. These are just some ways to mitigate the cheese these bosses throw at you.
  • Azari, the Devourer: A pure race, since he burns your deck for two cards every turn. You can't spend too many resources removing his minions, but you also need to take away as much of his ability as you can to get good trades. His only major removal spell is DOOM!, which makes it doubly necessary you do everything possible to keep the game from reaching turn ten. If you're lucky he'll lose at least one to a Doomguard discard. Otherwise it's just a slugfest between his deck and whatever doesn't get burned from yours. If he burns the cards you need to beat him, there's not much you can do about it.
  • King Togwaggle: His deck is pretty meh. Play around the fact he has both Evasion and Sudden Betrayal as rogue secrets. Otherwise everything is about his hero power and the treasures he dredges up with it. Thankfully they're not on the level of the stuff that comes from treasure chests, but rather they're the treasures you can pick up along the way for your own deck (which can still wreck your face). Eventually he'll get something great for him and terrible for you, but you don't know what or when, so all you can really do is play a strong game and try to keep resources available in case he hits you with something like a Wand of Disintegration.
  • The Darkness: This boss is hell. If you have a lot of small minions, the free minions it gets every turn will run them over, and its Cabal Shadow Priests can steal them too. It has a ton of removal, both single target and board clear. You have three advantages: your deck is bigger; the board clears also wipe out the Darkness' minions, including the one played that turn; and the boss can only hurt you with minions.

    More than likely you'll need huge minions that can trade better than 1-for-1 with the Darkness spawns. Jade is very good for this, as long as you can live long enough to get them to 5/5 and above. Hand buff decks are good. Having the +1/+1 passive is great, two of them even more so; it's so good that the existence of this boss makes taking that passive almost automatic if you see it. If you have stealth, you can control the trades, but the same idea holds—even if you try to aggro down the boss, your minions still have to be pretty big to do that before the board wipes come into play.
  • Vustrasz the Ancient: The obvious part of this fight is that if you kill a chest, Vustrasz will start damaging you and your board each turn. Less obvious is that if you keep the chests alive, it leaves less space for him to play minions that are usually more dangerous. The buffed chests aren't that problematic either, in terms of the damage they deal; Velen's Chosen can be a pain with the buff to spell damage. There's a limit to that, of course; if one of them gets to be 11/18, you're probably better off finding a way to kill it.

    Here's a fun fact, though: Vustrasz's hero power damage is based on how many chests are on the board. It's five minus the number of chests. Thus, if you get rid of a chest through something like Recycle, he'll still start doing damage because the chest is missing. However, this also means that if you have Marin the Fox, the chest he creates will replace one of Vustrasz's. If you killed a chest, or kill one after playing Marin, Vustrasz won't do any damage to you because he still has five chests.
  • Xol the Unscathed: You have two main things to deal with: her warlock quest and her beams. I've seen people say they got her to discard the quest somehow, but I've only ever seen her play it on turn one, so it must be with a lucky Orb of Destruction or something. Assuming she has the quest running, she's almost guaranteed to finish it at some point. Try to keep the Howlfiends from discarding multiple cards; killing them in one shot is fine, but if you have hard removal that can kill them without doing damage, that's even better. If you have board control when she plays the portal, the imps are generally manageable.

    The challenge of the beams is to track what she has and play around it, including keeping track of her discarded beams so you're not playing around a threat that isn't there anymore. The connection between what she says and the beam she gets is:

    Fatality: Destroy all damaged enemy minions.
    Fatigue: Destroy one of your mana crystals.
    Fear: Return a random enemy minion to your opponent's deck.
    Flame: Deal two damage to all enemy minions.
    Flummox: Gain control of a random enemy minion.
    Frost: Freeze a random enemy minion and the minions next to it.

    Certain combos are obviously bad news. If she has Flame and Fatality together, you might want to smack a Howlfiend to try and get one discarded if you have a strong board. Flummox is extremely dangerous early, in the turns where you're probably only playing one minion at a time. Waiting until you can play something less dangerous into the beam leaves you open to her zoo, which gets pretty strong even if she's not stealing your minions. Getting your board to a point where you can play around the beams is possible, just get the win before Deathwing comes and fucks up your business.


All treasure selections need to be made in consideration of the deck you're building or aiming for (if it's early). Sometimes a generally less good treasure is correct depending on what your deck is doing. That said, some things are plainly better than others. For the most part, this means taking consistent benefits over ones that have big potential but require you to highroll in some way. (The order of the items is in order of personal preference, but things in the same group are relatively close together.)
  • Must take: 
    • Captured Flag. Rare is the deck that doesn't benefit enough from +1/+1 to all minions that something else is preferable. The only time you might not want this is if it's very late in the run and you've wound up with a spectacularly spell-heavy deck, and even then there needs to be something else pretty good available.
    • Cloak of Invisibility. This is just about as good as Captured Flag unless you've already taken a large number of taunt minions. You don't know what you're going to face, minions are the most consistently useful resource available to you, and being able to control trades with stealth is the strongest way to use them. 
    • Crystal Gem. Starting with one extra mana crystal means by turn ten, you've had ten extra mana available to you. That's a ton as long as you're using it efficiently, and being able to hero power immediately means you'll never waste a turn no matter the draw (unless you're priest). Less useful if you already have Justicar's Ring, but not by much.
  • Usually take: 
    • Justicar's Ring. Pretty much every class benefits from an improved, cheaper hero power; the only downside is that if a deck curves well, you won't use it as much. Less useful if you already have the Crystal Gem.
    • Shifting Hourglass. Normally I wouldn't consider something you have to draw to be hyper important, but the Hourglass starts being very good around the halfway mark, which is when you start to need it, and decks should be built for the end of runs.
    • Wondrous Wand. The Wand is nearly guaranteed to give you a substantial discount and sometimes an enormous one; it ranges from good to game-breaking.
  • Often take: 
    • Archmage Staff. Few mage spells are downright useless, especially when they don't take up a slot in your deck, so getting one for free every turn out of a zero-mana weapon is fantastic. It can get in the way for weapon users, however, and there are times when you burn a draw from having too many cards. 
    • Embers of Ragnaros. The Embers are a cheap way to clear at least two things off the enemy's board, but even better, if you've already cleared the board it's 24 damage to the face. Because it's cheap, it can work on the same turn as some major board clears (e.g. Psychic Scream) to finish an enemy.
    • Scepter of Summoning. The Scepter is very good in the right deck, and sometimes the strongest pick regardless, but it somewhat needs the deck to be built around it to be truly effective. This item has the lowest floor in the group, as it's possible to end up without many minions that take great advantage of it, but when your deck is stacked with big things it's insane.
    • Glyph of Warding. Completely broken against bosses dependent on playing minions, but less helpful or useless against some of the hardest challenges. If you reach a point where end bosses and encounters like the Trapped Room are the only things that give you trouble, bump this down the list.
    • Wish. An absolutely bonkers spell that can save your ass, but you have to get to turn ten first and it doesn't do anything to the enemy's board. 
    • Potion of Vitality. Hero health isn't usually the most important thing, but late in a dungeon run, the health boost can swing matches by letting you play much more aggressively. It's also helpful because many of the bosses make bad decisions in going face rather than trading.
    • Gloves of Mugging. Can badly screw up some bosses, but others don't care at all. At worst it's not especially useful, but as an early game draw it's so good at wrecking what many bosses can do, and it makes a solid top deck as well. Doesn't rate higher because several bosses have junk in their decks, but even then you're taking away something, so it's never bad. 
  • Sometimes take: 
    • Robe of the Magi. Holy shit-level power on damage spells, especially AOE that only hits the enemy board, but you rarely have enough of these for the Robe to give you a major advantage.
    • Wand of Disintegration. Incredibly powerful one time, but too often the bosses you use it against can refill the board. Really good sometimes, not nearly as good as you want it to be at others, assuming you draw into it at all.
    • Magic Mirror. Bump this up if you have the option to take it when you already have several minions in the deck you'd like to copy. Otherwise it relies on the hope you'll draw both the Mirror and something you want another copy of, because not every boss has something you'll want in their deck.
    • Boots of Haste. Never really as good as A.F. Kay makes it look, and maybe the worst top deck of any treasure, but the bananas potential makes it worth taking if there aren't any better options.
    • Horn of Cenarius. Move this up if you already have a very recruit-friendly deck. At minimum, however, you have the beginner minions that might get recruited, and not many decks carry lots of big minions without the Scepter of Summoning, which makes the recruit function a little less useful (though still very good).
    • Golden Kobold. It's pretty nice to see when you get it out of a treasure chest, but that's because it lands directly in your hand. In this case, you're taking it as something you have to draw, which makes it less good. But it can still save a bad hand, and it's a 6/6 taunt for three mana, so it's never a terrible pick.
    • Vorpal Dagger. Can get you out of trouble in a hurry, save your board for a little while, and if you're a druid, going face with it to finish someone off is more of an option. Can get in the way of other weapons. More flashy than consistently effective—not that many bosses are liable to overwhelm you with minions, although that number includes all of the end bosses.
    • Khadgar's Scrying Orb. A huge boost to a spell-heavy deck, but not that many decks will be spell-heavy enough to use it well. More valuable if it's offered late and you already have a deck that can abuse it.
    • Totem of the Dead. Incredible with a lot of deathrattle cards, but if it's offered early, it's very hard to expect that you'll have enough of those cards to make it worthwhile. The value of this goes way, way up in hunter.
    • Battle Totem. The flip side of Totem of the Dead. It's a little easier to abuse battlecry cards since the effect happens right away, but this goes lower on the list because the battlecry bucket is in shaman and it just isn't as good as hunter deathrattle.
    • Loyal Sidekick. Like the Shifting Hourglass, this becomes more useful the later you go. It's not anywhere near as powerful as an extra turn, though. But a cheap, gigantic minion is always nice to have, and as a bonus, if Waxmancer Sturmi tries to copy him, the copy self-destructs.
    • Orb of Destruction. Removing two mana crystals is usually more helpful than the discards, but you have to draw it early for the crystal destruction to be of maximum use. Like the Glyph of Warding, this can absolutely dominate earlier bosses, but later bosses have enough tricks that you really need it at or near the beginning of the game for it to be of maximum use.
  • Rarely take: 
    • Amulet of Domination. Better than Magic Mirror in that it steals a minion rather than just copying one, but you may not have an option you'd want in your deck.
    • Bag of Stuffing. Occasionally fantastic, but you spend most of the game with a deck you don't want to draw a ton of cards from at once due to fatigue. Can let you keep a ton more cards against Azari, albeit at the cost of fatiguing much faster.
    • Mysterious Tome. Six mana worth of secrets at the start of the game for free is pretty good, but pretty good isn't much compared to what many of the treasures do. They're rarely bad and rarely incredible.
    • Party Portal. Much better if you already have the Cloak of Invisibility and some big spells (although even small ones are fine—free minions are free minions). Basically useless without stealth.
    • Bag of Coins. Lets you play an extra card or two. Useful but not overwhelming.
    • Wax Rager. Instant resummon makes this a better deathrattle than Dreadsteed, and during most of the run it can seem incredible. But it's usually terrible against the final boss; Xol can steal it, The Darkness can Entomb it, Togwaggle can get a treasure that either silences and destroys it or steals it, Azari can burn it, and Vustrasz... might be good against Vustrasz. The fact it can be so dangerous in other fights keeps it off the bottom level.
    • Small Backpacks. Two free cards. Sweet. Not that sweet.
    • THE CANDLE. A replayable 1-mana Flamestrike should be more useful than this. If your deck is strong, you just don't wind up needing this very often, and plenty of other treasures help to put you in that position.
    • Mask of Mimicry. Needs just the right situation to work. Helps if you have bad cards, which hopefully you don't.
  • Take only as a flier: 
    • Blade of Quel'Delar, Hilt of Quel'Delar. The weapon you get if you finish the sword is nuts, but it's almost impossible to get both pieces. Maybe if you end up in the Treasure Vault, but even then you'll probably have needed to get one piece earlier, and on their own you'll almost always have a better option.

      Basically, it's only worth taking one if the other two options are worse.
  • Avoid: 
    • Rod of Roasting. Not a totally unreasonable choice if you have the Potion of Vitality, and maybe ok if you're not confident you can beat the last boss in a straight up fight, but basically not good. If you get to turn ten and it's the only way you have to win, you're probably behind and more likely to lose anyway when you use it.
    • Portable Ice Wall. Quite a good blocker if the opponent can't remove it, but too many of them can, especially late in the run. If they steal or copy it, that's even worse. A 3/15 taunt that could attack might have some consistent value, but this is best in fights you shouldn't have trouble winning anyway.
    • Greedy Pickaxe. It's only good if you get it in the first few turns and don't already have a weapon worth using. Yes, the mana crystals are very good when it works out, but that's far too rare to waste a pick on this.
    • Primordial Wand. Can theoretically take a board weaker than your opponent's and turn it around, but you're usually either winning or don't have much to adapt. The ultimate win-more card, and surprisingly expensive at four mana given how cheap some of the other treasures are to cast.
    • Portable Forge. A weapon for one mana is almost like freerolling, but so many legendary weapons are useless (or useless for certain classes) that almost any other treasure is more likely to be helpful.
    • Grommash's Armguards. Most decks don't have the weapons to really abuse this, and you have to draw the weapons to abuse it on top of that.
    • Dr. Boom's Boombox. Funny, a good amount of total damage, but mostly uncontrollable.
    • Scroll of Confusion. Maybe you get the right spell at the right time. Probably you don't.
    • Aleatoric Cube. Destroy your deck for a discount on whatever you end up with. Defeats the entire purpose of building your deck carefully, plus a lot of bosses have cards that are simply weaker overall than yours.

Monday, November 27, 2017

Dave Reviews: A Box That Dreams Of Being A Game

Dream On

Readers of earlier posts may recall that I started doing reviews on this blog in part for the space to shit on Shahrazad, the coaster set that wanted to be a game. Prep your pants: it's time to review another goddamned non-game.

Spoiler alert: I actually like Dream On!, but it's not going to sound like it for a while. Although the irritation with seeing something like this packaged and sold as a game is real, this isn't nearly as problematic as with Shahrazad. Shahrazad was designed for one or two people, which meant all the enjoyment needed to be derived from the package itself. Dream On!, by comparison, plays up to eight, and its quality as entertainment is much more derived from the group you're playing with.

It's about as simple as simple gets: there's a deck of picture cards, and everyone takes three. One person puts a card down, starts a story, and draws a new card. After that anybody can play a card to add to the story, drawing a new one each time they do. After the two-minute timer runs out, the pile is flipped face down and players take turns, in order, remembering each piece of the story. Getting it right is worth two points; getting it right with help is worth one; and getting it wrong loses you two. There's a point scale at the end to gauge your performance, much like in Shahrazad and Hanabi.

I bring those two games in because I want to make a comparison between Dream On! and each of them. All three have something in common: they're cooperative, they have a basis for scoring points, and they have a scale by which your points performance can be judged. Shahrazad is a garbage non-game. Hanabi is absolutely a game, and an excellent one at that. Dream On! doesn't fit either of those descriptions. So why are these so disparate when they have so much of their cores in common?

If you google 'game', the definition is this: "a form of play or sport, especially a competitive one played according to rules and decided by skill, strength, or luck." Not all games are competitive between the players themselves; co-op games like Pandemic are a serious competition between the players as a group and the game's systems. Hanabi fits this definition right away. Just like Pandemic has you compete against the game to save the world, Hanabi has you compete against the game to finish the fireworks display. True victory only comes when you have all twenty-five tiles laid out in order. The point scale exists so people can have an idea how well they did when they fall short of this, because Hanabi is fucking difficult without people who know exactly what to do and understand how each other's decisions are speaking because they can't.

Technically, Shahrazad fits this definition as well. The game sets forth a simple set of rules and pieces, and you need to use those to finish the stories in a way that scores maximum points. That would make it a very bad game rather than not a game at all. However, I still don't think of it as a game for the reason outlined in my review: it's solvable. I have one additional definition that I believe is required for something to be a game, and that's fluidity. Either it has to offer different challenges for you to overcome each time; or, if the game throws the same things at you in the same order (think Super Mario Bros., or most platforming video games, for that matter), you have to have different ways to overcome the same obstacles. Shahrazad doesn't have that; it's a twenty-two piece puzzle with a slightly more complex method of putting it together than an actual jigsaw puzzle has.

The reason Dream On! isn't a game, on the other hand, is that there is no goal—to hearken back to the base definition of a game, there's nothing to be decided. In both Hanabi and Shahrazad, there's a point of completion that you're striving to reach. In Dream On!, you just go until the timer runs out, and you get however many points you earn based on your memory. There's a reason that points are used as a way to compare how different people or teams have done, and they work fine when a point total can be set against a maximum score, but when there is no rational maximum (nobody is getting through the entire deck), they don't really do anything. Thus, there is no actual game here.

What this is, instead, is an activity, a team-building exercise. It feels like the designers got caught between the need to make this a game so they could sell it and what it really is, because the 'game' parts are the worst ones. Not only is the point scale meaningless, but the negative points for getting the next card in the dream wrong—and you're not allowed to skip any—are punishing. When our group played, all we did was say two or three words related to each card because it was far easier to remember that way, but that goes against the stated intent of the creators to turn every card into a real piece of a story. We also completely disregarded the scoring.

And we had a goddamned fantastic time.

Ignore the score for this game. In the interests of some sort of objectivity, I take into account what the game does and not what could be done with it by enterprising individuals when I dish those out. And even as an activity, this isn't very good if the directions are tightly followed. It's just a really complicated version of Memory, and if you try to come up with sentence-long story ideas for each card, you're going to bork a bunch of them when doing the recall. Or, maybe, you'll get them right with help, but then you still won't get max points.

Play with this, even get a copy if you run a class or other type of group (four groups of four or five can compete against each other, and then it's definitely a game), and do what's most fun. It really can be a good time. The designers just couldn't seem to figure out where that good time sits.

Score: Six shoddy memories out of eleven I wasn't playing much attention to.

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Dave Reviews: Classy Dig Dug


When participating in an archaeological dig, remember that all good ruins were built on a strong foundation of victory points.

Unearth is a dice worker placement game of placing... dice... workers... start over.

Unearth is a cross between games like Colony, where dice are rolled and then used strategically based on their rolls, set collecting games like Coloretto, and generic worker placement game #168. The difference between Unearth and those games is that one worker die is given a ruin to visit, then rolled, rather than the other way around. Then you collect sets of ruins, preferably of the same color, although different colors are ok if you get one of each color, and the stones build into wonders...

Unearth is an easy game to understand but a harder one to explain without having it in front of you.

The game is set up with a tableau of ruins and wonders. Each ruin has three aspects to it: points, color, and stones. When you place a die on a ruin, if you roll a 1, 2, or 3, you can take a colored stone off it; if there are none left, you instead take one randomly out of the bag. If, at any time, the total of the dice equals or exceeds the points on the ruin, the ruin goes to the person with the highest individual die (think Smash Up bases but with a different first place condition). All dice on the ruin are returned to the players, and anyone with dice on the ruin that doesn't win it gets one Delver card for each die they had there. Thus, where in Smash Up you might avoid putting points on a base that you have no chance of winning to force your opponent to invest more resources, sometimes you may want to put more dice on a ruin you won't get to either get more Delver cards (which are fairly strong) or just get back the dice you already have there (you can't re-use a die if it's on a ruin unless you have no dice left to roll).

Where collecting ruins rewards high rolls, stones relate to wonders and reward low rolls. Stones are placed in front of players in a hexagonal pattern. You don't need to create a hex with your first six stones, but after the first goes down, all stones played need to touch at least one already in front of you. All the wonder cards on the table have a certain color pattern that must be met in order to take that wonder and its associated power or points. These are chosen randomly, but there are also greater and lesser wonders available every game; greater wonders go to anyone who makes a hex of six same-colored stones, while lesser wonders are created by six stones that don't match each other or any pattern available. Lesser wonders are the least valuable, while greater wonders give the most points but may not be as good as wonders with certain abilities—this must be decided by the player's priorities.

Oh, and I didn't mention yet that the dice are different sizes. Every player uses five dice—a d4, three d6s, and a d8. Anyone familiar with those dice types will see the design here right away. You roll a d4 when you want to win a stone, and a d8 when you want to win a ruin, with the understanding that unless you play a Delver card that lets you manipulate the roll, there are no guarantees it will turn out the way you want. You also always have to consider the fact that when you roll those dice, especially the d4, it may take time to get them back, and plan around that if you have a particular strategy in mind. In general you don't want to give opponents sets of cards, but since everyone has the ruins they win face up (with a single face down ruin dealt out at the start of the game), you have a pretty good idea how much it will hurt you to give away a ruin as a trade for getting back dice and Delver cards.

There are several ways to score, all of them coming at the end of the game. Wonders are worth points, plus five bonus if you have at least three. Sets of the same color of ruin become worth substantially more points—if you can collect a set of five, you'll probably win—but if you're collecting a set everyone can see it face up, so that's harder to accomplish. Get a five color rainbow and that's five bonus points. Trying to get both bonuses is tricky but possible; trying to build wonders while winning a set is harder still.

This multiple-paths-to-victory type of game always carries the risk of making people prone to analysis paralysis. For the most part, Unearth doesn't suffer from that. If it happens, it's generally due to wanting to play Delver cards, especially if you're holding several. Early on you only have a couple, so it's not an issue, and late you're just going to dump them because it's obvious the game will end soon, so even when it happens it's usually in about the same third of the game (depending on the players, of course), which isn't too bad. It's also mostly contained to newer players, as veterans will have a better idea when they want to play their cards, especially if they have the odds figured out.

That ability to figure out the odds gives players a way to win through skill in a game that, using dice, is inherently set up to have some random outcomes. It's easy to understand, with enough play that it should take several games before any sense of sameness kicks in. If you reached into a bin of sub-one hour games and pulled this out, consider yourself very lucky.

Score: Thirteen super shiny rocks out of fifteen.

Dave Reviews: Hotel Chain Magnate


In the world of corporations, you eat and grow, or get eaten and die. And by die, we mean earn a bunch of payout money for the business you started that you can use to grow again, because that's what getting eaten means for people, which is what corporations are.

Acquire is ancient by board game standards, originally a 1964 release that's seen multiple reprints over the years. The concept of the game is simple: start companies, buy stocks in whatever ccompanies exist, and use those stocks to make more money than your opponents. The value of a company is based on how many tiles it takes up on the board. Thus, if you get stock in a business that's only two tiles big, and it expands, your stock immediately becomes more valuable. This is how we think about stocks working--you invest, the company grows, and your stock is worth more.

However, Acquire has a different twist on this. If you focus on the companies that are going to survive forever, you won't win, because your money will be locked up in stocks that won't earn you anything until the game's over. In the short term, you need to have stock in smaller companies that will merge and be taken over by the larger companies, because when the merger happens you earn a bonus based on how much stock you have in that company compared to everyone else. If you routinely are the largest stockholder in companies that get eaten, you will make bank. Furthermore, you can turn those stocks into stocks of the bigger company on a two-for-one trade basis, or you can keep them for later; companies that go down early can get started again later, and with a limited amount of stock in each company, having some already in your possession gives you a head start when they do.

It's one of those games with mechanics that work at odds with the theme. Look at the major corporations we're familiar with: Microsoft, Apple, Walmart, Target, Amazon. The heads of these companies, and especially the founders, are some of the richest people on the planet because their companies either pushed their rivals out of the market or just bought them outright. Getting on the team that wins early, before it's clear they'll be a winner, is key. Being a major shareholder in a company that gets absorbed by a larger one can be highly profitable, and plenty of people in that situation are doing just fine, but they never really get to the same level of wealth.

In Acquire, it's not that there's no upside to getting in on the ground floor of a company that becomes too big to be overtaken—the stocks will be some of the most valuable at the end of the game, and you'll probably be the primary stockholder, giving you the biggest bonus—but rather that the best way to succeed is to angle your way into being the biggest stockholder in companies that get bought out while also making sure you have stock in those bigger companies for the end of the game. Very little costs you money, the rewards for getting bought out are considerable, and those rewards are crucial to having the resources to be set up well for the end game. It's incongruous with how we understand that an economy works, which makes it very easy to for new players to get completely off-track by doing what feels logical, but isn't in relation to this game.

As a pure game (ie. mechanics, balance, etc), Acquire is pretty good. You constantly need to track how much stock is available, try to remember how much each person has of a given stock (fairly easy with three players, just about impossible with five or six), plan when and where you want to create mergers with the tiles you have in hand, and do your best to suss out whether or not someone will beat you to that merger. If there's a mechanical issue, it's that starting a company gives you a substantial boost (one free stock and the ability to buy three more immediately, which you can leverage into just about guaranteeing yourself primary ownership), but drawing a hand of six tiles for the 10x10 board makes it quite possible that someone in a large game will simply not get the opportunity to make a company early enough for it to matter. Even though it plays up to six people, you may want to max the game out at four if you wish to minimize the odds of this problem occurring.

However, whether or not this is recommended largely depends on your approach to games. If you're a person who cares about the story a game tells, the clash between Acquire's gameplay and what it represents might get in the way of your enjoyment. The game's not complicated, and after a play through you should understand how the strategy works, but that doesn't mean the strategy is going to feel right if you're trying to perceive yourself as a CEO doing her best to become a capitalist god. If you just want a way to test yourself against your friends and the paint on the board doesn't matter, go for it.

Score: Five failed companies out of the seven in the box.

Saturday, November 4, 2017

Holy Fucking Shit

Thug Rose, round 1 KO.

Is this real life?

When I first saw Namajunas fight, I was really excited about the idea of her getting to the top, but damned if I ever expected it to happen now, against this champion. It seems like she's been around so long it's impossible she's only twenty-five, and that experience is why she's able to be a champion at what is quite a young age, but holy shit!

I'm super happy for her. I hope she can hang on to the title for a while, and I hope the UFC gives her a platform to be positive the way they give others a platform to talk shit. She's one of those people who refrains from negativity while also not being boring as shit. She can pull interest from fans who will love the fact she's a champion badass and high-level human being all at once, if they expose her to those fans.

She's going to have to keep the title and snag a couple defenses to really hit her popularity stride. I like Joanna, and I would have been happy to see her keep the belt, but now I hope she moves to 125 and Rose can hang on to this title for a while.

UFC 217

I want to do this quickly, but I wonder if that's even possible.

Joanna Champion vs. Thug Rose: I like Rose as a fighter, and the honesty she shows when she talks about pretty much anything. I think the fighting world would be better with her as a champion. But for that to really be true, she'd have to be a seriously dominant champion, the way Joanna is, and the way she's going to be after this fight. Joanna by decision.

Neck Tattoo Garbrandt vs. TJ Snakeinthegrass: The first time Cody hit the spotlight, I just shook my head, because what Dominick Cruz said in the lead-up to their fight was right on: he seems like kind of an idiot. Dude can't rub two thoughts together without setting them on fire and losing both. I don't expect every fighter to have McGregor levels of gab capability, but I can't envision ever being interested in what this guy says if there's no outside reason to be curious (e.g. the feud with Dillashaw).

But he seems like a decent guy--bringing the kid into the ring seemed odd, but I think it comes from a good place--and the more information that comes out, the more that TJ really does appear to be a serious clownfucker piece of shit. I think it's possible that TJ puts up more of a challenge than Cruz did, odd as it is to watch myself write that sentence, but I don't think it's likely, even disregarding the fact I definitely want to see him lose. Garbrandt by 4th round TKO.

Steroid-Free Mikey vs. The Elder God: I realize calling them by these names makes it sound like I'm completely in the bag for GSP. If this was pre-retirement, I would be, even if GSP hadn't taken the time to go up in weight and was effectively fighting a full weight class up. But now? I believe GSP has trained appropriately for this fight, and I'm not assuming he'll be way off what we're used to seeing, yet Bisping has ramped up his game so dramatically that alone changes how it looks like this fight will go.

Bisping's not a wrestler, although he can defend against grapplers reasonably well. GSP was always on another level in that respect, though. That said, I'm not sure GSP's ground game translates as well to middleweight, even if he's puffed up to the point where that's his new natural weight class. I think most of this fight revolves around whether or not I'm right. I think I am. Bisping by decision.

Friday, November 3, 2017

League Worlds Finals

Prediction: The team I don't pick in five.

How in the bloody hell fuck are you supposed to figure out who's going to win this match? Samsung is playing better than SKT, period. They're from Korea, so they have plenty of experience against SKT specifically and teams on that level in general. They lost twice to RNG in groups, but right now that looks like a completely different team from the one going to the finals. There is zero reason to think Samsung is at a disadvantage in terms of player quality, teamwork, or anything else that matters.

As great as Faker is, I hate the argument that SKT wins because they have Faker. They have a very solid team mindset that has been up against the wall in every conceivable fashion, and when it comes to Worlds Bo5 matches, they've found a way to win every time. They're, what, 9-0 in elimination games? 3-0 is impressive. 6-0 is crazy. 9-0 is obscene, on the verge of inhuman. For all the problems some of their players have had, they constantly pull it together when everything is on the line, including against Korean teams (2016 ROX and Samsung, for example). Even knowing that, however, it's hard to disregard the fact that Misfits, RNG, EDG, and ahq all had SKT beaten bloody and looked incapable of finishing the game. All of them had sufficient control to win the games where they had big leads, but they left openings that it's reasonable to think Samsung won't.

Yet... SKT has Faker. It's not even that they have Faker, but they have the Faker that's been playing in this tournament, who may ascend to a dimension above the ranks of normal humans if he carries this team to a championship. The LoL meme of playing 1v9 doesn't exactly apply, but it sure as hell feels like he's playing 1v5 sometimes, to the point that to pick SKT feels like you're picking one man and his team's history against the five ultra-badasses rolling up on him tonight.

And only an idiot would blame a person for doing exactly that. Objectively, taking a player and a team's history into account when predicting future results is... not silly, but very easy to let overwhelm one's thought process. But at some point a team does this so often that to pick against them feels like you're just asking to get burned when they do it again (says the guy who picked RNG to beat them). It's like, you know they shouldn't be a favorite, but they've done this for so long you can't actually imagine the world in which they lose.


SKT in 5.

Dave Reviews: Linguistic Hybrid Man-Beasts


Take Werewolf, One-Night variety, add a dash of Twenty Questions, forget how to stop counting at twenty, and voila:

Like normal Werewolf, there's a Seer, a Werewolf, and some villagers, and all the non-Werewolves are trying to find the Werewolf. Like One-Night, there's only one round of gameplay, and everything is over in five minutes.

The difference is in the challenge placed before the villagers. There's a magic word, chosen by the Mayor from a short list, which the Seer and the Werewolf also know. All players close their eyes, and the game's phone app directs the relevant characters to open their eyes in turn so they can see the magic word. Then all players ask the mayor questions, which she answers by handing out yes, no, maybe, or so close tokens. The players have four minutes or until the mayor runs out of tokens to guess the word. They can take as many guesses as they want, but each wrong guess eats a no token.

The Seer's goal is to guide the players towards the correct answer, while the Werewolf's job is to ask questions that guide them away from it. If the villagers guess the word, the Werewolf reveals himself and has one chance to guess who the Seer is; if successful, he wins. If the villagers don't guess the word, they have one chance to guess the Werewolf, and if successful they win. Thus most of the game hinges on the Seer and the Werewolf, as they need to affect the data being revealed without making their roles apparent.

(Note: The Mayor also receives a role, which means she can theoretically end up as the Werewolf. If this happens, she can lie about the answers. Being in control of the answers can make throwing the villagers off easier, but given that the Seer knows the word, it can also be an easy way to get busted if you send them too far off away from the actual word.)

Werewords is an ultra-fast party game, to use for either a few rounds as a warmup for bigger games or to play for many rounds if everyone's having a good time. It's important to remember how game size and the skill of the Seer/Werewolf are in determining outcomes. If the villagers keep getting Seers who are too obvious about what they know, it can look like the game is skewed heavily towards the Werewolf when the Werewolves keep pulling out wins. Likewise, inexperienced Werewolves might be prone to getting busted and feeling like it's impossible to win. The game itself, though, allows for a broad enough array of strategies (literally any question you can come up with is allowed, and you need to pick the ones that will help you win) that it's not weighted in either direction unless the good guy/bad guy ratio is skewed. (The instructions don't say at what number of players you should add the Beholder, Minion, or second Werewolf, so experience and a desire to experiment will have to be your guide.)

Much like in regular Werewolf, most of the responsibility falls on the people with the special roles. If you're a piddly little Villager, you have about as much impact on the game as in Werewolf: plenty if you're thinking and being active, very little if you're passive and let others lead the action. On the plus side, it doesn't suffer from the Werewolf problem where active players are assumed to be special roles, and often are accused of being Werewolves just because they're so vociferous. In Werewords, there's no potential downside to trying to get involved, and you may just lure the Werewolf's attention away from the real Seer.

Basically, it's Werewolf, it's word games, and it's cheap. If at least two of those three attract you, you'll probably like Werewords.

Score: Five dead villagers with their guts spread across the street in the shape of the alphabet out of six.

Wednesday, November 1, 2017

November 3rd, 2020

I read something, in response to the Mueller investigation against Paul Manafort, that betting odds on Trump surviving his first term are under fifty percent. When I went to look it up, I discovered something I've apparently whiffed on for the past several months—the odds have been under fifty percent for a while.

Granted, the main betting channel I see mentioned is Paddy Power, an Irish gambling site that is almost certainly taking advantage of the money people desperately want to throw at the idea of Donald Trump being unceremoniously dumped out of the presidency. I mentioned in regards to the Mayweather/McGregor fight how the desire of people to bet a certain way can skew gambling odds way out of whack as compared to the actual odds of a thing happening. Even now, as this presidency somehow continues to grow as a clusterfuck day after day, I don't think the odds of a resignation or impeachment leading to removal are over fifty percent, or realistically anywhere near it. There are too many people politically invested in not letting this presidency fail that badly for removal to happen, and Trump is stubborn enough to not quit.

But, goddamn, what a time to witness. The concern of people being too distracted by Trump to notice the ridiculous shit that's actually being done isn't as bad as I thought it could be, but it's still a thing and I hope we don't forget to keep paying attention.